Note: If you live in a “higher-priced” state like
Calif., NJ, PA, FL or TX, OREP does not limit coverage or raise rates on you. Same rates apply in all states
where this program is offered.
Check out OREP today.
Experienced home inspectors say that this case begs the question: is the
home inspector liable to the seller at all?
Home Inspector Sued By the Seller?
By Natalie Eisen, Isaac Peck, and David Brauner
Can an inspector be sued for just about anything? The answer is-
It’s a fact of life that a home inspector is likely to find some
issues with the house he or she is inspecting – even new
construction has problems! If it’s a home inspector’s job to
report issues to buyers so they can make an informed decision
before purchasing, when are they liable for just doing their
job? Can an inspector be responsible for how a buyer
reacts to the findings in the report if they decide not to buy?
One seller in Connecticut thinks they should be. The seller, who
a Realtor, has
sued a home inspector in small claims court because the buyers
lost interest in purchasing a house after reading the inspection
report. This leaves experienced home inspectors scratching their
heads wondering when they may be liable and how to
Two issues seem to be at play: the accuracy of the report and
who has standing to sue.
Regarding the first issue, liability probably
depends on the quality of the report provided, most agree.
“I think an inspector may be liable if the
findings are in error,” says Lawrence Transue, a Pennsylvania
home inspector. “If that is the case I believe the seller has a
legitimate gripe and possible grounds for a suit,” says Transue.
Transue says an exaggeration or mistake would mean that the
buyer’s decision to walk away stemmed from the home inspector
and not any problems in the home, leaving the home inspector with
a difficult position to defend in court. On the other hand, if
the report is accurate and the seller is just displeased about
the buyer not purchasing the home, home inspectors generally
agree that the lawsuit or complaint is frivolous. “I
have had several sellers file complaints on me over the years,”
saysJim Starkey, a Texas home
inspector. “The sellers were angry that the buyer walked. They
accused me of making false statements about the house which
caused the deal to fall through, but when you read what I wrote
and see the pictures of the defects, it was very obvious I did
my job and they were totally clueless. These cases were all
judged in my favor and that was the end of that,” says Starkey.
Your Assets Many home inspectors keep scrupulous records of their inspections
in order to avoid being sued. They recommend never advising
clients towards or against buying the house – only presenting the
facts and letting them make their own decisions. If the client is
with you during the home inspection, you can use a voice recorder
or camera to record the inspection, as some home inspectors do.
“I carry a voice recorder in my shirt
pocket,” explains Steve Ott, an inspector from Ontaria,
record every word I say during an inspection and file them all. If
someone comes back to me in the future and says I said such and
such, I can go listen to the entire inspection.”
Being able to stop a complaint or lawsuit before it
snowballs is a strategic option. If the client isn’t with you, be
sure to keep records of conversations you have had with them.
Save emails, and transcribe phone calls if you are concerned. When
you are inspecting the home, take pictures of any problems you may
find. Record-keeping pays off when you need it.
But what if a suit occurs anyway? “I'd
firmly stand my ground,” says David Tucker, owner of The Inspector
Inc. “If the lawsuit wasn’t retracted, I would hire a lawyer
to first send the seller a ‘demand letter’ for retraction, then I
would file a counter-suit in the county court,” says Tucker.
Others advise petitioning to move the case to a higher court, or
simply waiting out the case in small claims court.
“The seller is not the inspector's
client and has no contractual agreement with the inspector. The
seller's ‘contract’ is with the buyer,” says Tucker. ”Don’t
let yourself be intimidated, and remember that you are accountable
to the person who paid for the inspection– not the Realtor or the
seller.” But in some states, third parties who do not directly
engage the inspector, can sue. You should consult a local
Non-Client Can Sue
Regarding whether a third party such as a seller
or agent has standing to sue, Todd Stevens, experienced
home inspector trial lawyer and past President of the San Diego
Bar Association, says it depends on the specific laws in each
state. Stevens says the legal term at issue is privity,
which posits that only parties to a contract should be able to
sue to enforce their rights or seek damages. "In some states,
privity is required to file a lawsuit like this. However, in other
states like California, privity is not required. My advice to any
home inspector in this situation, even if you believe the law is on your side in your state,
take the threat of a lawsuit seriously and not ignore it," says
Stevens. Even if the seller isn't able to sue you based on
your contractual obligations to them, there still may be other
ways for them to pull you into a lawsuit.
story continues below)
Joseph Denneler, another lawyer experienced in home inspector
claims, concurs that the ability of a third party to bring a
suit varies by state. "It
depends on the particular state law. Generally in a
contract-based relationship a stranger to the contract has no
standing to sue for non-performance or for flawed performance.
However, I have defended several third-party suits in New Jersey
where inspectors were sued by someone with whom they had no
relationship at all. Judges are not apt to dismiss claims
even though there is clearly a legal flaw in the proposition.
Every time I raise this argument I get a curiously blank stare
from the judges," says Denneler.
It turns out that whether or not a
claim is considered frivolous is also defined by state law.
"In [this] example, most states would not find that claim to be
frivolous if it can be argued that the claimant is trying to
change the law or proffer a new type of claim that the law
doesn’t currently recognize," says Denneler.
Michael Casey, principal at Casey O'Malley Associates, says that
situations where the seller sues the home inspector are very
seller suing the inspector because of the deal falling out is
rare.In my experience
of over 600 inspector claims, only one was of this type.We responded that the home inspector complied with the
Standard of Care and reported material defects as required by
published Standards of Practice, thus fulfilling his/her
This particular claim went away," says Casey.
The other type of claim that might arise from a seller is an
indemnity claim, Casey explains. "I have seen some cross claims
against inspectors by sellers for indemnity when they are sued
by the buyers, and the inspector is not named in the original
action (usually because the condition was in the report, but not
properly repaired or nothing was done).These in my opinion are rare, but must be defended like
any other claim," says Casey.
Veterans agree that the best thing to do is whatever you’re
comfortable with. If it goes to court and you choose to fight it,
present the best case you can for yourself, armed with the facts
and confidence that you have done the right thing.
ATTENTION: You are receiving WRE Online News because you opted in at WorkingRE.com or purchased E&O insurance from OREP. WRE Online News Edition provides news-oriented content twice a month. The content for WRE Special Offer Editions is provided by paid sponsors. If you no longer wish to receive these emails from Working RE, please use the link found at the bottom of this newsletter to be removed from our mailing list.