Working RE logo




Contact Us button Advertising Information button Low Cost E&O button Readers Respond button Find Articles button
 

OREP: Low cost, same-day E&O Insurance

Fraud or Incompetence: You Make the Call
by David Brauner, Editor

F
raud or incompetence? According to Larry Disney, Executive Director, Kentucky Real Estate Appraisers Board, that is a question that regulators across the nation are grappling with as they sort through the growing number of complaints against appraisers. The answers are not always clear cut.  

When recent sales used as comps turn out to be "flips" with inflated values, for example. Changes reflected in the new Fannie forms are specifically geared to make "innocent mistakes" less likely and to hold appraisers more accountable (so be careful). Since most appraisers who bend the rules do so just to keep orders flowing (and not to get rich quick), one question Disney believes worth asking is: "Is this really worth my license?"

Fraud/Complaints Soar
“Based on my observations in the Kentucky office for appraiser regulation, and conversations with other state appraiser regulatory officials, it appears that complaint case filings are increasing in mortgage lending appraisal assignments,” Disney said.

“The complaints typically are categorized into three areas, 1) ethics, 2) competency, and 3) negligence. Upon investigation we discovered in Kentucky that the problem areas are linked or attributed to 1) real property appraiser education course content, 2) deficiency in training by a supervising appraiser, and 3) pressure from clients to ‘hit’ a target value. Item three (3) appears to be the area with the highest frequency of complaints in the past three years,” he said.

This is supported by the U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Investigative Division publication titled “Financial Crimes Report to the Public,” (May 2005). The report lists the number of mortgage fraud cases pending as 436 for 2003, 534 for 2004, and 642 through the second quarter of 2005. During the same period the numbers of mortgage fraud convictions and/or pretrial diversions listed 256 for 2003, 172 for 2004 and 95 through the second quarter of 2005. 

Based on the information and the findings in cases before the Kentucky Board, Disney says it is apparent that the number of complaints originating from financial institutions and review appraisers has also been increasing steadily for the past three years. The interesting part of the complaint puzzle is the type of activity that is alleged and, in many cases, proven to have occurred, he said.

“In one case it was discovered a property was purchased for $25,000. Within a very short time, without any repairs or modernizations, the same property allegedly sold for $100,000 and appraised for $90,000. There was no support for the value opinion and no support from the comparable properties in the market area of the subject property. The same lender and appraiser were involved in many similar occurrences- multiple, back-to-back transfers of the same property, each time at a significantly higher dollar amount,” Disney said.

Scam Alert
According to Disney, appraisers should beware of the following scam, which is growing in popularity. A property is listed for sale. A buyer’s agent contacts the seller’s agent and informs him/her that the buyer will pay the list price but has no money for a down payment.

The can make the deal work, they say, if the seller agrees to an unrecorded second mortgage or a seller-paid concession “outside” closing for the amount equaling the desired down payment. The selling agent is advised that the property must be withdrawn from the Multiple Listing Service at the lower price and re-listed immediately for a higher price to include the necessary down payment. When questioned about this practice the selling agent is told, “Don't worry, we have a lender and an appraiser who understands what to do and we can make this happen.” 

According to Disney, this scenario happens all the time. “Appraisers and agents should be aware that the above act or any act of willful deceit to assist in obtaining a loan secured by a federally-regulated financial institution is considered bank fraud and carries the possibility of a $1,000,000 fine and 30-years imprisonment.”
   Full Story   Subscribe  

Working RE Home