![]() |
Cost Approach: Why Sidestepping It Can Be Costly
Cost Approach "I don't like using
the cost approach. It's too time consuming. Market-based appraisals are always
more reliable. Besides, I'm not required to include the cost approach in my
appraisals. It's not relevant anymore." Sound familiar? If you're skipping
the cost approach, you could be doing a great disservice to your clients and
your appraisal practice. Here's why. The cost approach is
the most reliable valuation method for a variety of assignments. It is primarily
useful when projecting costs for new or proposed construction or where a lack of
market activity limits the effectiveness of the sales comparison or market
approach. It is an essential method when land value is well supported, when
improvements represent the highest and best use of land, and for special-purpose
properties not frequently exchanged on the market. It is an excellent way
to verify the validity of market value and to adjust estimates to account for
unique features of the subject. It
is also extremely useful in determining depreciation values for physical
deterioration or functional or external obsolescence, as applied to the market
approach. Dollars and Sense Based on the reasoning
that a buyer will not pay more than the cost to reproduce or replace the subject
property, the cost approach is used to determine a replacement or reproduction
cost minus depreciation. That figure is then added to the estimated land value
to complete the appraisal. Many argue that the cost approach can be unreliable
and incomplete. And depending on the extent of the training and expertise of the
appraiser, this can be the case. But in these instances, incorrect usage and
wrongly applied methodology are more to blame than the method itself. Market Approach:
Appraiser Beware (If you have E&O insurance through OREP and have not registered yet for your free access, email for details subscription@workingre.com.)
|